Lakeside’s Field Erected Cooling Towers
Facilities like large air-conditioning plants, power plants, steel processing plants, petroleum refineries and petrochemical plants typically use field-erected type cooling towers due to their capacity for heat rejection. Distinguished from ‘package’ type cooling towers on account of their large size, field-erected towers allow for better individual cell maintenance and a continuous cooling process. Lakeside offers multi-cell cooling towers for large-scale projects like in the above-mentioned applications, guaranteeing a streamlined and efficient cooling process.
Lakeside’s Multi-Cell cooling towers package
These types of cooling towers are factory pre-assembled, and can be simply transported on trucks, as they are compact machines. The capacity of package type towers is limited by their transportable size and, for that reason, are usually preferred by facilities with low heat rejection requirements such as food processing plants, textile plants, some chemical processing plants, or buildings like hospitals, hotels, malls, automotive factories etc.
Heat transfer methods
With respect to the heat transfer mechanism employed, the main types are:
- Dry Coolers operate by heat transfer through a heat exchanger. Water within the system is cooled by the external ambient air, such as in a tube or plate air heat exchanger, utilising convective heat transfer. Limited to the use of external air temperature to cool the water, they do not use evaporation.
- Wet Cooling Towers (or Open Circuit Cooling Towers) operate on the principle of evaporative cooling. The water being the fluid and its evaporation being the principal cooling function. In the operation of Open Circuit Cooling Towers, warm water can be cooled to a temperature lower than the ambient air/dry-bulb temperature. As ambient air is drawn past a flow of water, a small portion of the water evaporates.
Advantages of Evaporative Cooling:
The energy required in an evaporative water-cooling process is much lower than that of an air-cooling process, where chiller cooling is employed. The chiller capital outlay requirement is smaller, therefore reducing its energy consumption by extension. Energy absorbed for each pound of evaporated water is 970 BTU (2 MJ/kg). Evaporation results in saturated air conditions, lowering the temperature of the water processed by the tower to a value close to wet-bulb temperature, which is lower than the ambient/dry-bulb temperature. Cooled water temperature is governed by the relative humidity of the ambient air.
To achieve efficient cooling performance, a heat exchange medium called ‘fill’ is used to increase the surface area and the time of contact between the air and water flows.
- Fluid Coolers/Condensers (or Closed Circuit Cooling Towers) pass the working fluid through a tube bundle, upon which water is sprayed and a fan-induced draft applied. The resulting heat transfer performance has the advantage of protecting the working fluid from environmental exposure and contamination.
In a wet cooling tower (or open circuit cooling tower), warm water can be cooled to a temperature lower than the external, ambient air/dry-bulb temperature. As ambient air is drawn past a flow of water, a small portion of the water evaporates, and the energy required to evaporate that portion of water is lower than that required in the air cooling process.
Approximately 970 BTU (2 MJ/kg) of heat energy is absorbed for each pound of evaporated water. Evaporation results in saturated air conditions, lowering the temperature of the water processed by the tower to a value close to wet-bulb temperature, which is lower than the ambient/dry-bulb temperature. The difference in temperature is determined by the humidity of the ambient air.
To achieve better performance (more cooling), a heat exchange medium called ‘fill’, is used to increase the surface area and the time of contact between the air and water flows.
Air flow generation methods
With respect to drawing air through the tower, there are three types of cooling towers:
- Natural draft — Utilises buoyancy via a tall chimney. Warm, moist air naturally rises due to the pressure differential. This moist air buoyancy produces an upwards current of air through the tower.
- Mechanical draught — Uses power-driven fan motors to draw or force air through the tower.
Typical two such methods are:
- Induced draught — A mechanical draft tower with a fan at the discharge (at the top) draws air up through the tower. The fan induces hot moist air out the discharge. This produces low entering and high exiting air velocities, reducing the possibility of recirculation where discharged air flows back into the air intake. This fan arrangement is also known as draw-through.
- Forced draught — A mechanical draft tower with a blower type fan at the intake.
The fan forces air into the tower, creating high entering and low exiting air velocities. The low exiting velocity of the fully saturated hot air is much more susceptible to recirculation. With the fan on the air intake, the fan is more susceptible to complications due to freezing conditions. Another disadvantage is that a forced draft design typically requires more motor horsepower than an equivalent induced draft design. The benefit of the forced draft design is its ability to work with high static pressure. Such setups can be installed in more-confined spaces and even in some indoor situations. This fan geometry is also known as blow-through.
- Fan assisted natural draught — A hybrid type that appears like a natural draft setup, though airflow is assisted by a fan.
Hyperboloid (sometimes mistaken for hyperbolic) cooling towers have become the design standard for all natural-draft cooling towers because of their structural strength and minimum usage of fan energy which is offset by the requirement of powerful water circulating pumps. The hyperboloid shape aids in accelerating the upward convective air flow.
These designs are popularly associated with nuclear power plants. However, this association is misleading, as the same kind of cooling towers are often used at large coal-fired power plants as well as oil refineries. Conversely, not all nuclear power plants have cooling towers, and some instead cool their heat exchangers with lake, river, or ocean water.
Hybrid Cooling Towers
These are also known as Combinair and can be Crossflow or Counterflow cooling towers that incorporate a heat exchanger at the air discharge outlet of the cooling tower.
The saturated warm air discharge flows through the heat exchanger through which water is circulated and provides pre- heating of water used for numerous process requirements hence providing energy savings and what is also known as co-generation.
Thermal efficiencies up to 92% have been observed in hybrid cooling towers.
Crossflow Cooling Towers
Crossflow is a design in which the air flow is directed perpendicular to the water flow (see diagram above). Air flow enters one or more vertical faces of the cooling tower to meet the fill material. Water flows (perpendicular to the air) through the fill by gravity.
The air continues through the fill and thus past the water flow into an open plenum chamber and finally out into the atmosphere.
A distribution or hot water basin consisting of a deep pan with holes or nozzles in its bottom is located near the top of a crossflow tower. Gravity distributes the water through the nozzles uniformly across the fill material.
Advantages of the crossflow design:
• Gravity water distribution allows smaller pumps.
• Fan and motor accessible from top deck.
• Internal walkway for access to fill.
Disadvantages of the crossflow design:
• More prone to freezing than counterflow designs.
• Variable flow is useless in some conditions.
• More prone to dirt build-up in the fill than counterflow designs, especially in dusty or sandy areas.
• Larger Site footprint requirement.
• Inaccessible for internal inspection during operation.
• Noisier than counterflow type.
Counterflow Cooling Towers
In a counterflow design, the air flow is directly opposite to the water flow (see diagram). Air flow first enters an accessible area beneath the fill media, and is then drawn up vertically. The water is sprayed through pressurized nozzles near the top of the tower, and then flows downward through the fill, opposite to the air flow.
Advantages of the counterflow design:
• Reduced civil construction costs
• Spray water distribution makes the tower more freeze-resistant.
• Breakup of water in spray makes heat transfer more efficient.
• Access for inspection whilst working.
• High velocity fully saturated air discharge- detracts from recirculating.
• Can be used in natural draft cooling towers.
Disadvantages of the counterflow design:
Older design can be noisier, due to the greater water fall height from the bottom of the fill into the cold-water basin.
Forced Draft Counterflow Packaged Type
Forced Draft Design Advantages:
Can be used in enclosed areas with a single air intake.
Tend to recirculate fully saturated discharged air causing performance failure. Poor access for maintenance. Standard centrifugal fans corrode and disintegrate due to chemicals in the water treatment. Difficult fans replacement. Fan drive belts require maintenance or replacement. Closed circuit types’ water coils are subject to corrosion and difficult to repair.
Common aspects of both designs:
• The interactions of the air and water flow allow a partial equalization of temperature, and evaporation of water.
• The air, now saturated with water vapor, is discharged from the top of the cooling tower.
• A “collection basin” or “cold water basin” is used to collect and contain the cooled water after its interaction with the air flow.
Wet cooling tower Summary
Quantitatively, the material balance around a wet, evaporative cooling tower system is governed by the operational variables of make-up volumetric flow rate, evaporation and windage losses, draw-off rate, and the concentration cycles.
In the adjacent diagram, water pumped from the tower basin is the cooling water routed through the process coolers and condensers in an industrial facility.
The cool water absorbs heat from the hot process streams which need to be cooled or condensed, and the absorbed heat warms the circulating water (C). The warm water returns to the top of the cooling tower and is sprayed downward over the fill material inside the tower. As it trickles down, it contacts ambient air rising up through the tower either by natural draft or by forced draft using fans in the tower. That contact causes a small amount of the water to be lost as windage/drift (W) and some of the water (E) to evaporate. The evaporation of the water cools the water back to the basin.
The water is then ready to recirculate. The evaporated water leaves its dissolved salts behind in the bulk of the water which has not been evaporated, thus raising the salt concentration in the circulating cooling water. To prevent the salt concentration of the water from becoming too high, a portion of the water is drawn off/blown down (D) for disposal. Fresh water make-up (M) is supplied to the tower basin to compensate for the loss of evaporated water, the windage loss and the draw-off water.
Call us today for an obligation free quote
Telephone: +61 03 9555 4844
Facsimile: +61 03 9555 4866